This post at Biologos criticizes Al Mohler’s recent comments. Criticizing Al Mohler is a common theme these days at Biologos.
I posted a comment that linked to examples of uncivil discourse by Biologos and called for the same standards for both sides. The following comment was twice deleted:
Why the continued focus on Mohler, when Biologos engages in the same rhetoric?
Misrepresenting and ridiculing Michael Behe.
Making baseless claims that ID proponents are knowingly stating falsehoods.
Why the attack on Mohler, and no criticism of Giberson or Ussery? Shouldn’t both sides work to improve the rhetoric?
UPDATE: My comment has been restored. I received an email informing me that I was banned, and then another saying that this was caused by some confusion and apologizing. Thanks, Biologos. I know mistakes happen.